#106 Fanatics Bought Its Way Around CAC

One operator just skipped the auction entirely.

Author of the essay

Author Profile

We’ve spent this year watching operators bid up the price of attention. A podcast host signs an exclusive sportsbook deal. A baseball franchise hands its sportsbook category to another. A league goes quiet on its own sponsorship slot because nobody wants to pay 2021 prices any more. Every one of these deals is really the same trade: pay someone else, upfront, for the right to stand in front of an audience they already built.

Fanatics never bothered joining that auction. It already owns the audience.

The flywheel nobody’s bidding against

On 20 May, Fanatics and American Express announced a co-branded credit card sitting on top of Fanatics ONE, the loyalty programme that had already crossed 30 million members by then. Every dollar spent on the card, on a jersey, on a pack of Topps cards, or on a stadium ticket earns FanCash. And FanCash spends the same whether you’re buying a hoodie or funding a same-game parlay. The discovery pattern tells you what’s happening: Fanatics increasingly gets found through platform queries like “Fanatics FanCash sportsbook” and “best sportsbook for Fanatics customers” rather than sportsbook-quality queries. That’s a betting brand being discovered through a retail relationship, not a betting one.

That’s the bit most of us are missing while we argue about who’s paying what for a podcast slot.

Jim Collins spent years studying what separates companies that compound from companies that merely grow, and the mechanism he landed on was the flywheel: a sequence of moves that reinforce each other, so each turn takes less energy than the last, not more. Most sportsbooks are the opposite of a flywheel. Every new customer costs roughly what the last one cost, sometimes more, because the whole machine runs on rented attention. A podcast slot, a broadcast overlay, a search ranking. All of it has to be paid for again every season, forever.

Fanatics doesn’t need a fresh push each quarter. A customer buying a jersey today was already inside the machine before Fanatics spent a cent finding them. The sportsbook doesn’t have to win that customer; it just has to be the next stop on a journey they’d already started. That’s a reported $2 billion of 2025 betting and gaming revenue sitting on top of a database of more than 100 million identified fans, built by selling shirts and trading cards, not by outbidding DraftKings for a podcast.

And before anyone objects that the audience wasn’t free: of course it wasn’t. Fanatics paid for it through league merchandise licences and acquisitions. The difference is that the cost is capitalised upstream into a retail business that washes its own face, so the sportsbook’s marketing line never sees it.

Why this should worry more than the sportsbooks

Here’s the uncomfortable part for the rest of us. Every CAC benchmark we use, from CPA rates to affiliate commission structures to the maths behind a podcast deal, assumes acquisition is something you buy in a market. Fanatics’ cheapest customers were never in that market. They walked in through a storefront. The real competitive threat isn’t that Fanatics will outbid you for the next McAfee-style deal. It’s that it’s converting demand you’ll never even see a bid for, because it never had a price.

To be fair to the sceptics: Fanatics Betting & Gaming is still single-digit market share nationally and, by most accounts, not yet profitable. And we’ve heard the “we already have the fans” pitch before. Twice, in fact, from the same company. PENN made it with Barstool’s audience, then again with ESPN’s, and ESPN Bet limped to less than 5% market share before the whole partnership was wound down last December. A fan database is not a bettor database until proven otherwise.

But there’s a distinction worth sitting with before you file Fanatics next to ESPN Bet. PENN rented someone else’s audience and got a logo and a media schedule in return. Fanatics owns the transaction data, the rewards currency, and the storefront the customer keeps coming back to. Every additional vertical it bolts on, whether the credit card, the collectibles business, or the prediction-markets play, adds one more surface where a fan becomes a bettor without anyone in marketing lifting a finger. That’s not a CAC advantage you can outspend. It’s one you can’t buy your way into, because it was never for sale in the first place.

So here’s the question worth sitting with, whichever side of the affiliate-operator fence you’re on: if your best customer next year is someone who never clicked your ad, never heard your podcast host, and never saw your odds overlay, because they were already loyal to somebody else’s ecosystem before they’d thought about placing a bet, what exactly are you bidding for?

P.S. If you’re an affiliate, it’s worth an honest audit of your own assets, not just betting content, for anything that does what Fanatics’ merch store does. A loyalty base that predates the bet is worth more than a lower CPA.