The latest rulings focus on proceedings between SPRIBE and Aviator Studio itself. This distinction is important because Brazil has already seen separate AVIATOR-related cases involving Foggo Entertainment and Betnacional.
In the São Paulo proceedings, courts declined to grant urgent measures requested by SPRIBE. As a result, Aviator Studio and its partners can continue operating while the dispute moves through the evidentiary phase.
The decision does not settle ownership of the AVIATOR mark. It only means the court did not see enough reason to restrict Aviator Studio at this early stage.
The Distinctive Features of the São Paulo Rulings
SPRIBE claims exclusive rights to the Aviator name and says it developed the original crash game in 2018. Aviator Studio Brazil says it operates under a licence granted by Aviator LLC.
A separate Brazil case involved NSX Brasil S.A., the company behind Betnacional. SPRIBE said a Pernambuco court had ordered Betnacional to stop using the AVIATOR mark. However, the publicly accessible case trail did not fully confirm the underlying order.
Another component in relation to the Brazilian picture is Foggo Entertainment. Sources citing the São Paulo rulings state that Aviator Studio Brazil can continue to collaborate with partners, including Foggo Entertainment (also known through Blaze).
Brazil Becomes a Key Test Market
The regulated gambling market in Brazil makes this dispute much more important. Currently, suppliers, operators, and studios need to adapt themselves to being in a licensed environment. In these settings, there can be overlaps in many different ways: from brand names to platform liability.
When it comes to the AVIATOR dispute, the overlap has become rather complicated. The game name, AVIATIR, is not only a title on a game screen. It can affect operator catalogues, supplier contracts, player recognition, and access to a regulated market.
Currently, Aviator Studio has secured some maneuvering room in Brazil. SPRIBE can still consider pursuing its claims through regular proceedings.
Final Notes
The latest São Paulo decisions weaken the case for immediate restrictions. However, they do not end the trademark fight. The next meaningful signal will come when courts move beyond urgent relief and examine the evidence behind each side’s claim to the AVIATOR name.
