The company markets the solution as a layer for outcome-based or event-driven markets that can be used in conjunction with an existing casino or sportsbook offering. Specifically, TRUEiGTECH speaks of three ways to implement the product:
- Turnkey solutions for quicker time-to-market;
- Custom development for operators seeking more extensive customization;
- Clone development and API integration for teams that would rather integrate prediction markets into their existing tech stack.
TRUEiGTECH also seems to frame prediction markets as a solution that can be implemented across various types of events (such as sports, politics, finance, and entertainment). Real-time trading and settlement are viewed as the key features.
Why Prediction Markets are on Operator Roadmaps
This development is part of a larger trend of operators trying to find adjacent products that don’t feel like a copy-paste sportsbook. Several industry publications note aggressive growth projections for the vertical. According to expert estimates, leading prediction market platforms could see annual trading volumes of around $1 trillion by 2030 (up from $10 billion currently), with revenue potentially topping $10 billion by then.
As for iGaming operators, the immediate interest is clear: prediction markets can be deployed as a modular feature, piloted in small niches, and scaled rapidly. That’s particularly feasible if the operator already has payments, KYC, CRM, and customer support infrastructure in place.
Regulatory Watchpoints in the US
The positive side goes beyond a product question. In the US, the legal line between “event contracts” and state-regulated gambling is still in dispute. The CFTC recently reaffirmed its longstanding position that it has exclusive authority over prediction markets, although several states are currently suing operators from this sector in court.
This is important to suppliers of regulation-ready tooling. Operators will want clarity on geofencing, disclosure, surveillance, and contingency planning in the event that a state-level action occurs in the middle of a rollout.
The most critical due diligence issue for operators is whether they can maintain a stable product in the face of shifting regulatory interpretations, and prove integrity to regulators and partners. The ones who approach prediction markets as a compliance-intensive trading product from day one are more likely to succeed.
