The Social Gaming Leadership Alliance (SGLA) criticized California’s Senate after it passed Assembly Bill 831 unanimously on September 8. The legislation targets dual-currency and prize-awarding sweepstakes operators, but SGLA argues it primarily protects large gaming interests at the expense of tribal nations.
Why SGLA Says This Bill Crosses the Line
Executive Director Jeff Duncan called AB 831 “fundamentally flawed” and serving “the narrow interests of a few powerful groups.” SGLA contends the bill threatens legitimate businesses with criminal liability while stripping economically disadvantaged tribes of essential development opportunities. About 100 tribal community members protested outside the Sacramento State Legislature to deliver a message supporting tribal sovereignty.
What AB 831 Actually Does to Tribes
The legislation bans companies that allow players to buy virtual coins and win real prizes, effectively shutting down the sweepstakes model many smaller tribes rely on for revenue. SGLA warns this creates an uneven playing field favoring established casino operators. Tribal advocates called to “Stop AB 831” to prioritize economic rights over the interests of wealthy gaming operators.
How This Tribal Divide Plays Out
SGLA argues AB 831 jeopardizes jobs and eliminates opportunities for economically disadvantaged tribal nations, ignoring voter preference for regulation and taxation over outright bans. Wealthy gaming tribes stand to benefit while smaller tribes lose crucial revenue streams. The alliance urges Assembly members to reject the legislation and instead pursue equitable, regulated solutions that support tribal self-determination and generate tax revenue.
The bill now returns to the Assembly’s Governmental Organisation Committee for review, with tribal and industry pressure shaping the final outcome.
